Tuesday, May 4, 2010

Memory Anchored in the sign


from Morality: Memory and Desire, by Luigi Giussani:

The Christian life depends upon the eucharistic sacrament as a spring or a source out of which can be drawn a motivation that is sufficient for real moral commitment (cf. 1 Corinthians 10:14-22). It is from within the context of such an offering that a correct Christian attitude on morality is formed (cf 1 Corinthians 11:17-26).


However, the great sign that is the Eucharist is caught up and enlarged in an even greater sign, the Church, the only truly adequate sign of the Presence of "the fullness of him who fills all in all" (Ephesians 1:23).

This "body, joined and knit together by every joint with which it is supplied, when each part is working properly, grows and upbuilds itself in love" (Ephesians 4:16). This Body is the place where morality arises and is nourished and grows in love.

To awaken the moral conscience of somebody is a reality that belongs totally to the unity in which all Christians live as brothers through baptism (cf Galatians 3:26-27 : "For in Christ Jesus you are all sons of God through faith. For as many of you as were baptized into Christ have put on Christ"). This unity is preserved and developed by authority (cf. Ephesians 2:20 : "built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets") and its purpose is to stimulate a kind of self-expression that is exercised for the good of the whole community. All this is the true basis for a real pedagogy in Christian morality.

The immanence of the mystery of community, to the extent that it is recognized, loved, and participated in, penetrates our being as if by osmosis with new moral standards and new moral sensitivity (pp 172-173)

Dumbstruck by the Mystery

...our temptation is always to impose our prejudices or our measure on reality -- except when we are faced with a fact that leaves us dumbstruck, and instead of dominating the fact ourselves, we are dominated, overcome by it. If there were no moments of this kind, the Mystery could do anything, but in the end, we would reduce everything to the usual explanation. But not even a Nobel Prize winner can stop himself from being dumbstruck before an absolutely gratuitous gesture. If there were not these moments, we would find answers, explanations, and interpretations to avoid being struck by anything. It is good that some things happen that we cannot dominate, then we have to take them seriously, and this is the great question of philosophy. If the conditions for the possibility of knowledge (see Kant) impose themselves on reality or if there is something that is so powerfully disproportionate that it does not let itself be "grasped" by the conditions of possibility, then the horizon opens. If this were not the case, then we could dominate everything and be in peace, or at least without drama. Instead, not even the intelligence of a Nobel Prize winner could prevent him from coming face-to-face with a fact that made him dumbstruck -- instead of dominating, it was he who was dominated. Here begins the drama, because I am called to answer. It is the drama that unfolds between us and the Mystery, through certain facts, certain moments, in which the Mystery imposes itself with this evidence. These are facts that we cannot put in our pocket, which we cannot reduce to antecedent factors.
-- Julian Carron in "Friends, that is, Witnesses."